“It undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.”In an era where political neutrality is nearly impossible for public figures—especially those as prominent and controversial as Elon Musk—the billionaire entrepreneur has again demonstrated his ability to toe the line between support and criticism. Speaking in a recent interview with CBS, Musk addressed his views on the Trump administration , offering a nuanced perspective that aligns with certain core conservative values while simultaneously distancing himself from specific policies. His comments spanned topics from the controversial federal spending bill to immigration, tariffs, and his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a bureaucratic reform initiative that has garnered both praise and criticism.
What makes this interview particularly revealing is not just what Musk said, but how carefully he said it. While he acknowledged his agreement with "much" of what the Trump administration has done, he was quick to insert caveats that shield him from being painted as a blanket supporter. His criticisms—especially on fiscal issues and government efficiency—appear rooted in libertarian principles, yet his avoidance of deeper political conflict signals a desire to remain strategically neutral.
Elon Musk ’s diplomatic distance from Trump era governance
Elon Musk’s comment— “It’s not like I agree with everything the administration does... But we have differences of opinion”—perfectly encapsulates his strategy: engage without full endorsement. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has previously served on White House advisory councils during the Trump presidency but has also publicly broken ties when disagreements arose, such as on the US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.
Musk’s current approach seems aimed at maintaining influence without entrenchment. He recognizes the benefits of having a working relationship with the administration, especially on matters related to deregulation, innovation, and space exploration. But by highlighting “differences of opinion,” he distances himself from more controversial or unpopular aspects of Trump-era governance, such as immigration restrictions and deficit-heavy spending.
Musk slams Trump’s spending bill: ‘Big or Beautiful, Not Both’
One of the sharpest critiques Musk offered was against the Trump administration’s latest federal spending bill, which he argues runs counter to the objectives of DOGE—an initiative Musk has been linked to, focused on reducing government waste and increasing operational efficiency.
“I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn’t decrease it,” Musk said.
In Musk’s view, the bill represents a philosophical contradiction. The administration touts fiscal responsibility, yet approves expansive spending packages that balloon the national debt. His tongue-in-cheek remark— “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don’t know if it could be both”—masks serious concern behind his trademark wit.
As of 2025, the US national debt has surpassed $36 trillion, raising alarms across party lines. While Trump and many Republicans continue to push for tax cuts and defense spending, the deficit remains an unresolved tension point for fiscal conservatives like Musk, who see such growth as unsustainable.
DOGE under fire: “The Whipping Boy” of federal reform
Musk also used the interview to defend the embattled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has become a lightning rod for criticism amid widespread cuts to federal services. Created to streamline bureaucratic processes and eliminate redundancy, DOGE has been accused of undermining critical public services and operating without a nuanced understanding of federal agency functions.
“It’s a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,” Musk remarked. “If there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE.”
DOGE’s mission is, in theory, aligned with longstanding conservative goals—reducing the size of government, increasing accountability, and boosting productivity. But in practice, its actions have led to real human consequences, including layoffs, reduced program funding, and a growing mistrust of federal modernization efforts.
Public backlash has been swift. Critics claim that DOGE’s tech-centric efficiency model fails to account for the human and social dimensions of government work. Musk, however, sees this as ideological resistance rather than operational failure:
“I’m like a proponent of smaller government, not bigger government,” Musk said. “So if somebody’s a proponent of more government programs… they’ll be fundamentally opposed to DOGE.”
Trade wars and tariffs: “Affect Things a Little Bit”
On global trade policies, Musk took a more cautious approach. When asked about the impact of tariffs—especially during the Trump administration’s height of trade tensions with China—he downplayed their severity:
“You know, tariffs always affect things a little bit,” he said, offering no further elaboration.
This brief remark suggests a calculated avoidance of conflict. Musk’s global enterprises—Tesla's Gigafactory in Shanghai, for example—require delicate balancing with both US and Chinese governments. By minimizing the impact publicly, Musk shields his business interests while not overtly challenging Trump’s America First economic policies.
However, trade experts argue that tariffs have had notable effects. Tesla, for instance, had to adjust vehicle prices in China multiple times between 2018 and 2022 due to shifting tariff rules. While Musk refrains from politicizing these adjustments, the economic realities remain influential behind the scenes.
Immigration and foreign talent: ‘Let’s stick to spaceships’
One of the more telling moments in the interview came when Musk was asked about immigration policy, specifically restrictions on foreign student visas—a move that directly affects the tech industry and immigrant entrepreneurs like himself.
Rather than engage, Musk redirected the conversation:
“Yeah. I mean, I think we wanna stick to, you know, the subject of the day, which is, like, spaceships, as opposed to, you know, presidential policy.”
Pressed further, he responded only with: “No, well—no.”
Musk’s reluctance here is notable. Though he is an immigrant who has previously spoken in favor of high-skilled immigration, he avoids criticizing Trump’s more restrictive policies. This may be due to political calculation: immigration is a deeply polarizing issue, and taking a strong stance risks alienating either key investors or a portion of his consumer base.
Still, silence is not neutrality. In 2020, when the Trump administration attempted to suspend the H-1B visa program, Musk was among the few tech leaders who criticized the move publicly. His recent deflection may signal a shift toward tighter media control over politically sensitive topics.
Musk questions big government: ‘Do you want the DMV to run it?’
Musk’s libertarian skepticism of government surfaced clearly when he described his general view of federal agencies:
“My frank opinion of the government is that, like, the government is just, like, the DMV that got big. So when you say, ‘Let’s have the government do something,’ you should think, ‘Do you want the DMV to do it?’”
This analogy—a favorite among small-government advocates—highlights Musk’s core belief: innovation thrives outside of government. It's a worldview that informs much of what he does with SpaceX, Neuralink, and Tesla, all of which are fundamentally disruptive ventures operating outside traditional bureaucratic constraints.
However, critics argue that Musk frequently benefits from government support, including federal tax credits, NASA contracts, and infrastructure partnerships. The DMV metaphor may appeal rhetorically, but in practice, Musk’s companies often rely on the very government he critiques.
Also read | Genshin Impact Codes | Fruit Battlegrounds Codes | Blox Fruits Codes | Peroxide Codes
What makes this interview particularly revealing is not just what Musk said, but how carefully he said it. While he acknowledged his agreement with "much" of what the Trump administration has done, he was quick to insert caveats that shield him from being painted as a blanket supporter. His criticisms—especially on fiscal issues and government efficiency—appear rooted in libertarian principles, yet his avoidance of deeper political conflict signals a desire to remain strategically neutral.
Elon Musk ’s diplomatic distance from Trump era governance
Elon Musk’s comment— “It’s not like I agree with everything the administration does... But we have differences of opinion”—perfectly encapsulates his strategy: engage without full endorsement. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has previously served on White House advisory councils during the Trump presidency but has also publicly broken ties when disagreements arose, such as on the US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.
Musk’s current approach seems aimed at maintaining influence without entrenchment. He recognizes the benefits of having a working relationship with the administration, especially on matters related to deregulation, innovation, and space exploration. But by highlighting “differences of opinion,” he distances himself from more controversial or unpopular aspects of Trump-era governance, such as immigration restrictions and deficit-heavy spending.
Musk slams Trump’s spending bill: ‘Big or Beautiful, Not Both’
One of the sharpest critiques Musk offered was against the Trump administration’s latest federal spending bill, which he argues runs counter to the objectives of DOGE—an initiative Musk has been linked to, focused on reducing government waste and increasing operational efficiency.
“I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn’t decrease it,” Musk said.
In Musk’s view, the bill represents a philosophical contradiction. The administration touts fiscal responsibility, yet approves expansive spending packages that balloon the national debt. His tongue-in-cheek remark— “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don’t know if it could be both”—masks serious concern behind his trademark wit.
As of 2025, the US national debt has surpassed $36 trillion, raising alarms across party lines. While Trump and many Republicans continue to push for tax cuts and defense spending, the deficit remains an unresolved tension point for fiscal conservatives like Musk, who see such growth as unsustainable.
DOGE under fire: “The Whipping Boy” of federal reform
Musk also used the interview to defend the embattled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has become a lightning rod for criticism amid widespread cuts to federal services. Created to streamline bureaucratic processes and eliminate redundancy, DOGE has been accused of undermining critical public services and operating without a nuanced understanding of federal agency functions.
“It’s a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,” Musk remarked. “If there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE.”
DOGE’s mission is, in theory, aligned with longstanding conservative goals—reducing the size of government, increasing accountability, and boosting productivity. But in practice, its actions have led to real human consequences, including layoffs, reduced program funding, and a growing mistrust of federal modernization efforts.
Public backlash has been swift. Critics claim that DOGE’s tech-centric efficiency model fails to account for the human and social dimensions of government work. Musk, however, sees this as ideological resistance rather than operational failure:
“I’m like a proponent of smaller government, not bigger government,” Musk said. “So if somebody’s a proponent of more government programs… they’ll be fundamentally opposed to DOGE.”
Trade wars and tariffs: “Affect Things a Little Bit”
On global trade policies, Musk took a more cautious approach. When asked about the impact of tariffs—especially during the Trump administration’s height of trade tensions with China—he downplayed their severity:
“You know, tariffs always affect things a little bit,” he said, offering no further elaboration.
This brief remark suggests a calculated avoidance of conflict. Musk’s global enterprises—Tesla's Gigafactory in Shanghai, for example—require delicate balancing with both US and Chinese governments. By minimizing the impact publicly, Musk shields his business interests while not overtly challenging Trump’s America First economic policies.
However, trade experts argue that tariffs have had notable effects. Tesla, for instance, had to adjust vehicle prices in China multiple times between 2018 and 2022 due to shifting tariff rules. While Musk refrains from politicizing these adjustments, the economic realities remain influential behind the scenes.
Immigration and foreign talent: ‘Let’s stick to spaceships’
One of the more telling moments in the interview came when Musk was asked about immigration policy, specifically restrictions on foreign student visas—a move that directly affects the tech industry and immigrant entrepreneurs like himself.
Rather than engage, Musk redirected the conversation:
“Yeah. I mean, I think we wanna stick to, you know, the subject of the day, which is, like, spaceships, as opposed to, you know, presidential policy.”
Pressed further, he responded only with: “No, well—no.”
Musk’s reluctance here is notable. Though he is an immigrant who has previously spoken in favor of high-skilled immigration, he avoids criticizing Trump’s more restrictive policies. This may be due to political calculation: immigration is a deeply polarizing issue, and taking a strong stance risks alienating either key investors or a portion of his consumer base.
Still, silence is not neutrality. In 2020, when the Trump administration attempted to suspend the H-1B visa program, Musk was among the few tech leaders who criticized the move publicly. His recent deflection may signal a shift toward tighter media control over politically sensitive topics.
Musk questions big government: ‘Do you want the DMV to run it?’
Musk’s libertarian skepticism of government surfaced clearly when he described his general view of federal agencies:
“My frank opinion of the government is that, like, the government is just, like, the DMV that got big. So when you say, ‘Let’s have the government do something,’ you should think, ‘Do you want the DMV to do it?’”
This analogy—a favorite among small-government advocates—highlights Musk’s core belief: innovation thrives outside of government. It's a worldview that informs much of what he does with SpaceX, Neuralink, and Tesla, all of which are fundamentally disruptive ventures operating outside traditional bureaucratic constraints.
However, critics argue that Musk frequently benefits from government support, including federal tax credits, NASA contracts, and infrastructure partnerships. The DMV metaphor may appeal rhetorically, but in practice, Musk’s companies often rely on the very government he critiques.
Also read | Genshin Impact Codes | Fruit Battlegrounds Codes | Blox Fruits Codes | Peroxide Codes
You may also like
Mass shooting in Toronto: At least one dead, 5 hospitalised; probe on
Elon Musk calls Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill a 'disgusting abomination'; how White House reacted
Found & released: 3 Indians missing in Iran rescued by cops in Tehran; all you need to know
IPL 2025: Kohli's RCB became champion for the first time, became the eighth team to win the trophy, defeated Punjab in the final..
Baked beans will taste way better with 'delicious flavour' if you add 1 ingredient
